<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
         xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0" 
         xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.jackvinson.com/archives/2003/05/20/chemical_industry_response_to_21_cfr_part_11_changes.html" /> 
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blog.jackvinson.com/archives/2003/05/20/chemical_industry_response_to_21_cfr_part_11_changes.xml" />
  <id>tag:blog.jackvinson.com,2007://1/tag:blog.jackvinson.com,2003://1.733-</id> 
  <updated>2007-12-03T12:15:25Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for Chemical Industry response to 21 CFR Part 11 changes</title> 
  <subtitle>Jack Vinson writes about knowledge management, personal effectiveness, theory of constraints and more.  As of December 2007 Jack will likely start writing about product management too.</subtitle>
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.01</generator>

  <entry>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:blog.jackvinson.com,2003://1.733" type="text/html" href="http://blog.jackvinson.com/archives/2003/05/20/chemical_industry_response_to_21_cfr_part_11_changes.html"/>


    <id>tag:blog.jackvinson.com,2003://1.733.3259</id> 
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.jackvinson.com/archives/2003/05/20/chemical_industry_response_to_21_cfr_part_11_changes.html#comment-3259" /> 
    <title>Comment from Kazm on 2006-01-22</title>
    <author>
        <name>Kazm</name> 
        <uri>http://www.chemisearch.com/</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.chemisearch.com/">     
      <![CDATA[ <p>ChemiSearch.com is the world largest chemical industry search engine.</p> ]]>
    </content>
    <published>2006-01-22T14:25:40Z</published>
    <updated>2006-01-22T14:25:40Z</updated>

  </entry> 

  <entry>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:blog.jackvinson.com,2003://1.733" type="text/html" href="http://blog.jackvinson.com/archives/2003/05/20/chemical_industry_response_to_21_cfr_part_11_changes.html"/>


    <id>tag:blog.jackvinson.com,2003://1.733.17913</id> 
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.jackvinson.com/archives/2003/05/20/chemical_industry_response_to_21_cfr_part_11_changes.html#comment-17913" /> 
    <title>Comment from chemical engineering on 2007-04-21</title>
    <author>
        <name>chemical engineering</name> 
        <uri>http://www.4engr.com/webs/type/277/index.html</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.4engr.com/webs/type/277/index.html">     
      <![CDATA[ <p>chemical engineering professionals are very similar to pharmacist.these professionals problem is very frequent ..for this the step taken by FDA interpretation of the 21 CFR Part 11 rules on Electronic Records and Electronic Signatures in FDA  is not so unrealistic...so far all will be benfited from it......however thanks for your very useful view.....</p> ]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-04-21T22:55:14Z</published>
    <updated>2007-04-21T22:55:14Z</updated>

  </entry> 

</feed>
