Conscious kills the unconscious knowledge?
A comment at the AOK discussion list turned up an interesting quote in a review of Friends in Low Places by Dr. James AR Willis, posted on his own website.
Welcome to Dr James A R Willis
The author quotes a wonderful piece of research which found that people are half as good at remembering a face in a photograph, if they've tried to describe it when they first see it. If we only trust our innate and wordless ability to remember a face, we are twice as likely to remember it: a metaphor for general practice. Doctors are being constrained not to rely on their hard-won experience, knowledge and skill, their unarticulated sense of what needs to be done. But instead always to use their conscious brain function to work out a solution. Thus quite possibly reducing their effectiveness by half.
This give a more accurate portrayal of the value of the "unconscious competence" pane of Johari's Window (the other windows being unconscious incompetence, conscious incompetence, and conscious competence). When a person knows their work so well, they don't need to articulate how they know it. This blurb suggests that in some cases, asking someone to explain their thinking actually reduces the value of their unconscious knowledge by forcing them to consider how it is they know something.
3 Comment(s)
Reflections on the dangers of making knowledge explicit - how it may actually undermine our knowledge and ability. Read More
Sounds kind of like Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle, except for knowledge instead of subatomic particles: You can measure the thinking, or the results of the thinking, but not both at the same time.
Or, put another way, the act of measuring thoughts changes the outcome of those thoughts.





Jack
thanks for the note. I was the person who posed the question on AOK. The JoHari window is an interesting angle on this. I'm not sure I'd relate it to unconscious incompetence, conscious incompetence, etc as you have done. Something to muse on
Regards
Dermot