Expert systems history

Interesting discovery about expert systems from KM and me:

From Working Knowledge, Prusak & Davenport, p. 137:

One recent research study found that only a third of the expert systems developed in the 1980s were still in use by 1992. The systems were abandoned less for technical reasons than for organizational ones - their sponsor moved on, there were difficult politics in extracting knowledge from experts (or representing users are less than expert), or the systems were viewed as too expensive to update and maintain.

The claim has always been that expert systems weren't adopted because it was too difficult to "extract" knowledge from the experts.  And that the systems were only able to recommend actions based on the context in which the expert(s) provided the knowledge.  Certainly, this is reflected in the "too expensive to update and maintain" comment.  But just like any other initiative, politics and sponsorship are important as well.

2 Comment(s)

Yoram Romem said:

I am preparing a PHD dissertation on Expert Systems, focusing on the reasons for their failure.
Could you please provide the research that you are refering too. Any other suggested reseach sources will be welcomed.

Thanks,

YR

» Shortcomings of expert systems from Knowledge Jolt with Jack

A commenter on a previous entry asked for some background on why expert systems have "failed." I'm not exactly sure of his context, but there are two schools of thought here: they have or they haven't failed. Read More

Leave a comment


About this Entry

This entry was published on March 9, 2005 9:51 AM and has 2 comment(s).

Trackback

Categories:

Related Entries

Previous entry: Visualizing delicious

Next entry: Value of skilled humans

Find recent content on the main index, explore the full tag cloud, or look in the archives to find all content.

Powered by Movable Type 4.21-en
Picture a steaming coffee cup. Better yet, grab one and have a read!

KJolt Memberships

Blogarama - The Blog Directory