LexThink: Collaboration

Sitting at LexThink today, which is a day-long Open Space session, where the organizers have gathered 50 lawyers, bloggers, authors, and independents.  We are talking about a variety of topics, though the focus seems to be mostly about "creating the perfect, 21st century firm." 

I was in a morning grouping around collaboration, we touched on a variety of interesting topics around how to make collaboration happen and where collaboration makes sense in the world of business.  Some of the big hits for me were trust, passion, and a unique aspect of virtual collaboration.

Collaboration can only happen in an environment of trust.  It's probably deadly obvious, but it needs to be said that without trust, people cannot truly work together and build something new.

Collaboration feels like it is more "loose" than "structured."  This made a big connection to me in the personal / corporate knowledge management discussion.  This then led the group to a discussion of passion and how this leads to better means of collaboration with people.  True collaboration can only happen amongst people who are interested and excited about the concept.  The topic of passion seemed to be a common thread across many of the conversations through the day, both on a personal level and the level of running a new firm.

The value of the virtual collaboration is that we can build relationships with our prospective collaboration partners without the filters of how they act or our own stereotypes about what they are.  In other words, the only image I build of you is based on what you talk about.  And if those things make sense to me and suggest to me a set of skills that might be valuable for a collaborative project. 

This may sound antisocial, but someone suggested dinners and related networking activities are "inefficient" mechanisms for getting to know people.  He would rather learn about people's ability and skills and context by reading this stuff online.  This isn't an end in itself, but when these people get together on a project, they have a different baseline of understanding and context around one another, and they can begin work at a higher level.  All the work around building common understanding doesn't get in the way of doing the collaboration work.

3 Comment(s)

Steve Nipper said:

Well put. Too bad more of the attendees weren't present in that particular conversation. It was amazing...to me, the highlight of LexThink!

Douglas Sorocco Author Profile Page said:

This is what is so exciting about LexThink -- each of the attendees trickling out there own thoughts and take-aways from the day. I wish I could have been in that group - but I chose the client/attorney relationship group. One client spoke up and told the story about when they asked their attorney to explain some "gotchas" to look out for in their new business, the attorney replied "It would take three hours and you couldn't afford it. Just give me a call when you run into a problem." Amazing. Made me think .... clients do pick up on our non-collaborative attitude.

» lexthinking about creativity from Legal Sanity

I recently returned from a week of business travel that started at LexThink Chicago, a very inspired and inspiring blogger gathering others have reviewed here, here, here and here. At LexThink, I thoroughly enjoyed meeting many terrific people and shar... Read More

Leave a comment

Previous entry: When Project Managers Attack!

Next entry: Push Awareness, Pull Content

Picture a steaming coffee cup. Better yet, grab one and have a read!

KJolt Memberships

Follow jackvinson on Twitter

View Jack Vinson's profile on LinkedIn