<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
         xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0" 
         xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.jackvinson.com/archives/2005/06/24/freakonomics_10_book_challenge.html" /> 
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blog.jackvinson.com/archives/2005/06/24/freakonomics_10_book_challenge.xml" />
  <id>tag:blog.jackvinson.com,2007://1/tag:blog.jackvinson.com,2005://1.7354-</id> 
  <updated>2007-12-03T11:56:42Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for Freakonomics - 10 book challenge</title> 
  <subtitle>Jack Vinson writes about knowledge management, personal effectiveness, theory of constraints and more.  As of December 2007 Jack will likely start writing about product management too.</subtitle>
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.01</generator>

  <entry>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:blog.jackvinson.com,2005://1.7354" type="text/html" href="http://blog.jackvinson.com/archives/2005/06/24/freakonomics_10_book_challenge.html"/>

    <id>tag:blog.jackvinson.com,2005://1.7354.p224</id> 
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.jackvinson.com/archives/2005/06/24/freakonomics_10_book_challenge.html#p224" /> 
    <title>Trackback in article Freakonomics and Information Assymetry from BarcodeBlog</title>
    <author>
        <name>BarcodeBlog</name> 
        <uri>http://www.barcodefactory.com/wordpress/?p=21</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.barcodefactory.com/wordpress/?p=21"> 
        <p>
              	Interesting propositions from the pair of authors of &#8220;Freakonomics.&#8221; I especially enjoyed the author&#8217;s recap of his appearance with Pat Robertson, on the CBN. The transcript of the appearance hits what must be some of the book&#8217;... <a href="http://www.barcodefactory.com/wordpress/?p=21">[Read More]</a>
        </p>
    </content>
    <published>2005-07-12T17:49:44Z</published>
    <updated>2005-07-12T17:49:44Z</updated>


  </entry> 

  <entry>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:blog.jackvinson.com,2005://1.7354" type="text/html" href="http://blog.jackvinson.com/archives/2005/06/24/freakonomics_10_book_challenge.html"/>


    <id>tag:blog.jackvinson.com,2005://1.7354.1144</id> 
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.jackvinson.com/archives/2005/06/24/freakonomics_10_book_challenge.html#comment-1144" /> 
    <title>Comment from Joe Potts on 2005-07-27</title>
    <author>
        <name>Joe Potts</name> 
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">     
      <![CDATA[ <p>Information assymetry as a useful concept is complete nonsense. First of all, knowledge, even of a specific subject, cannot be quantified. It is impossible for one person to "know more" about the object of an exchange than another (there are always two objects - usually, one of them is money).</p>

<p>If, say, the seller knows how far he has driven his car and what kind of fuel he put into it, the buyer knows things unknown to the seller such as how soon he must have a car, what money is worth to him just now, what he wants the car for, and whether he prefers it much to other cars also available at the same time and price.</p>

<p>Without information assymetry in the sense of DIFFERING information about the object of an exchange, no exchange would ever take place.</p> ]]>
    </content>
    <published>2005-07-28T01:16:21Z</published>
    <updated>2005-07-28T01:16:21Z</updated>

  </entry> 

  <entry>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:blog.jackvinson.com,2005://1.7354" type="text/html" href="http://blog.jackvinson.com/archives/2005/06/24/freakonomics_10_book_challenge.html"/>

    <id>tag:blog.jackvinson.com,2005://1.7354.p384</id> 
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.jackvinson.com/archives/2005/06/24/freakonomics_10_book_challenge.html#p384" /> 
    <title>Trackback in article Is asymmetry antithetical to KM from Knowledge Jolt with Jack</title>
    <author>
        <name>Knowledge Jolt with Jack</name> 
        <uri>http://blog.jackvinson.com/archives/2005/09/08/is_asymmetry_antithetical_to_km.html</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blog.jackvinson.com/archives/2005/09/08/is_asymmetry_antithetical_to_km.html"> 
        <p>
              In an email conversation with Joe Potts, inspired by a comment on my Freakonomics review, the idea that information assymetry and knowledge management might be on opposite sides of the fence came up.  My thoughts on this follow. <a href="http://blog.jackvinson.com/archives/2005/09/08/is_asymmetry_antithetical_to_km.html">[Read More]</a>
        </p>
    </content>
    <published>2005-09-08T21:17:16Z</published>
    <updated>2005-09-08T21:17:16Z</updated>


  </entry> 

  <entry>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:blog.jackvinson.com,2005://1.7354" type="text/html" href="http://blog.jackvinson.com/archives/2005/06/24/freakonomics_10_book_challenge.html"/>


    <id>tag:blog.jackvinson.com,2005://1.7354.17750</id> 
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.jackvinson.com/archives/2005/06/24/freakonomics_10_book_challenge.html#comment-17750" /> 
    <title>Comment from gleedlaw on 2006-11-26</title>
    <author>
        <name>gleedlaw</name> 
        <uri>http://www.startuphawaii.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.startuphawaii.com">     
      <![CDATA[ <p>For a challenge to the data on abortion and crime posited in Freakonomics, read here: <a href="http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2005/11/28/130806.shtml">http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2005/11/28/130806.shtml</a></p> ]]>
    </content>
    <published>2006-11-27T01:39:39Z</published>
    <updated>2006-11-27T01:39:39Z</updated>

  </entry> 

</feed>
