Corporate documents are generally non-fiction (one hopes) and not necessarily written to be consumed by a mass audience. As such, they are less subject to opinion and rating in the traditional sense of liked / disliked. I should also clarify that there are plenty of LONG internal documents, which require expertise and effort to understand and read.
Not only should the corporate rating be used to improve the content, but it should be part of a FAST cycle of improvement. One could do that with wikis or with other processes that require the author (owner) to be involved in ongoing upkeep.
]]>You have, perhaps, seen thousands of fragmented websites, discussion forums, which force you to dig for the information even more.
With Ratingo you got one-stop shop, where you can find what people think (and why) about all you have been searching for before.
]]>