<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
         xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0" 
         xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.jackvinson.com/archives/2006/10/28/is_tacit_knowledge_all_that.html" /> 
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blog.jackvinson.com/archives/2006/10/28/is_tacit_knowledge_all_that.xml" />
  <id>tag:blog.jackvinson.com,2007://1/tag:blog.jackvinson.com,2006://1.8031-</id> 
  <updated>2007-12-03T11:45:09Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for Is tacit knowledge all that?</title> 
  <subtitle>Jack Vinson writes about knowledge management, personal effectiveness, theory of constraints and more.  As of December 2007 Jack will likely start writing about product management too.</subtitle>
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.01</generator>

  <entry>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:blog.jackvinson.com,2006://1.8031" type="text/html" href="http://blog.jackvinson.com/archives/2006/10/28/is_tacit_knowledge_all_that.html"/>


    <id>tag:blog.jackvinson.com,2006://1.8031.17719</id> 
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.jackvinson.com/archives/2006/10/28/is_tacit_knowledge_all_that.html#comment-17719" /> 
    <title>Comment from Dennis McDonald in Alexandria, Virginia USA on 2006-10-29</title>
    <author>
        <name>Dennis McDonald in Alexandria, Virginia USA</name> 
        <uri>http://www.ddmcd.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.ddmcd.com">     
      <![CDATA[ <p>I also question the demarcation between tacit and explicit. In my understanding of expertise management systems, for example, I view helping seekers connect with experts as providing access to both types of knowledge. </p> ]]>
    </content>
    <published>2006-10-29T17:42:45Z</published>
    <updated>2006-10-29T17:42:45Z</updated>

  </entry> 

  <entry>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:blog.jackvinson.com,2006://1.8031" type="text/html" href="http://blog.jackvinson.com/archives/2006/10/28/is_tacit_knowledge_all_that.html"/>


    <id>tag:blog.jackvinson.com,2006://1.8031.17720</id> 
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.jackvinson.com/archives/2006/10/28/is_tacit_knowledge_all_that.html#comment-17720" /> 
    <title>Comment from Dr. Dan Kirsch on 2006-10-31</title>
    <author>
        <name>Dr. Dan Kirsch</name> 
        <uri>http://KMPro.org</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://KMPro.org">     
      <![CDATA[ <p>Hi Jack,</p>

<p>I'd already caught this post as well as Peter Klein's previous post that Nicolai refers to.  This to me is a part of the reason that I would really rather not even refer to the term "tacit" knowledge.  I think that it is too broad, to unmanageable, and perhaps provides little benefit as a label.  </p>

<p>I often joke about someone (anyone) discussing the benefits of KM with the organizational managers...while tapping their foreheads and stating knowingly, "And you know tacit knowledge is what is in our heads. (wink wink) And it's difficult to capture.  (wink wink) But it's the knowledge we need to focus on."  And I also imagine that about as soon as the conference room door is closed that those managers look  at each other, shrug and move on to the next agenda item.</p>

<p>I had thought about posting in my blog about the first article and this just might spur me on to talk about it now.  :-)</p>

<p>Dan</p> ]]>
    </content>
    <published>2006-10-31T16:09:11Z</published>
    <updated>2006-10-31T16:09:11Z</updated>

  </entry> 

  <entry>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:blog.jackvinson.com,2006://1.8031" type="text/html" href="http://blog.jackvinson.com/archives/2006/10/28/is_tacit_knowledge_all_that.html"/>


    <id>tag:blog.jackvinson.com,2006://1.8031.17721</id> 
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.jackvinson.com/archives/2006/10/28/is_tacit_knowledge_all_that.html#comment-17721" /> 
    <title>Comment from jackvinson on 2006-11-02</title>
    <author>
        <name>jackvinson</name> 
        <uri>http://blog.jackvinson.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blog.jackvinson.com">     
      <![CDATA[ <p>Thanks Dan and Dennis.  I always appreciate your comments.  </p>

<p>The idea that Dennis mentions of how Expertise Management Systems are sold is interesting.  I can see how the discussion might go.  Connecting seekers to those who have expertise is one of the long-sought goals of knowledge management, particularly when programmed-experts don't work a la expert systems.  Expertise is more than just a pile of knowledge that can be extracted and recorded somewhere, no matter how hard you try.  Expertise is the collected knowledge and experience, and it can really only be volunteered through discussion that brings to light the experience of the seeker and their context.  By the way, expert systems DO WORK in situations where the setting and userbase is very well known, for example.</p> ]]>
    </content>
    <published>2006-11-02T20:46:01Z</published>
    <updated>2006-11-02T20:46:01Z</updated>

  </entry> 

  <entry>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:blog.jackvinson.com,2006://1.8031" type="text/html" href="http://blog.jackvinson.com/archives/2006/10/28/is_tacit_knowledge_all_that.html"/>


    <id>tag:blog.jackvinson.com,2006://1.8031.17727</id> 
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.jackvinson.com/archives/2006/10/28/is_tacit_knowledge_all_that.html#comment-17727" /> 
    <title>Comment from Dennis D. McDonald in Akexandria, Virginia USA on 2006-11-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>Dennis D. McDonald in Akexandria, Virginia USA</name> 
        <uri>http://www.ddmcd.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.ddmcd.com">     
      <![CDATA[ <p>Jack, I like your sentence "Expertise is the collected knowledge and experience, and it can really only be volunteered through discussion that brings to light the experience of the seeker and their context." That emphasizes the iterative and interactive nature of a <i><b>process</b></i> which can extend far beyond connecting someone with recorded knowledge. (I also would like to get away from the term "tacit knowledge" which creates just as much eye-rolling and blank stares as the term "web 2.0" in some circles.)</p> ]]>
    </content>
    <published>2006-11-09T15:54:08Z</published>
    <updated>2006-11-09T15:54:08Z</updated>

  </entry> 

</feed>
