Call it a blog network, not community
Bill Bruck discovered something new in a white paper by Shawn Callahan I had blogged before. Specifically, he discovered an interesting comment about the difference between a community and a network with reference to blogging communities. Blogging 'communities' - where are the shared stories?
Shawn Callahan summarizes a point that Steve Denning makes in The Leaders Guide to Storytelling. Steve distinguishes between CoPs and [Knowledge] Networks where the latter consists of a group of people who link together for mutual benefit, such as an alumni. While a community of practice is a group with formed for the purpose of improving member practice. Shawn goes on to suggest that the way we perceive the group type as either a network or a CoP depends on whether people have heard and retell the group's foundational stories. I think this is a very interesting insight, and I would suggest that it applies to blogging 'communities.'
I've been talking recently about blogs and communities, and this aspect -- that there are shared stories within a community -- is an interesting addition to the discussion. Mostly, what I see shared across groups of blogs are conversations. However, after enough repeated conversations, do not communities form? At this point, I could tell the story of a number of bloggers and the conversations we've shared over the years.





Parsing the distinctions among these terms is an exercise in frustration, especially when you have to explain the subtle differences to people who don't use such jargon on a day to day basis.
It reminds me of a local series of ads that a grocery store chain ran in the Washington DC area many years ago. The tag line was something like, "From our family to your family."
Referring to employees of a humongous corporate chain of businesses as a "family" makes as much sense as referring to the people who register at your web site as a "community!"