<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
         xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0" 
         xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.jackvinson.com/archives/2007/03/08/no_such_thing_as_a_km_system.html" /> 
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blog.jackvinson.com/archives/2007/03/08/no_such_thing_as_a_km_system.xml" />
  <id>tag:blog.jackvinson.com,2007://1/tag:blog.jackvinson.com,2007://1.8163-</id> 
  <updated>2007-12-03T11:40:43Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for No such thing as a &quot;KM System&quot;</title> 
  <subtitle>Jack Vinson writes about knowledge management, personal effectiveness, theory of constraints and more.  As of December 2007 Jack will likely start writing about product management too.</subtitle>
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.01</generator>

  <entry>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:blog.jackvinson.com,2007://1.8163" type="text/html" href="http://blog.jackvinson.com/archives/2007/03/08/no_such_thing_as_a_km_system.html"/>


    <id>tag:blog.jackvinson.com,2007://1.8163.17854</id> 
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.jackvinson.com/archives/2007/03/08/no_such_thing_as_a_km_system.html#comment-17854" /> 
    <title>Comment from David Montgomery on 2007-03-09</title>
    <author>
        <name>David Montgomery</name> 
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">     
      <![CDATA[ <p>Your final remark is both succinct and apt yet all too often overlooked.</p>

<p>Undoubtedly technology can do many things but people working together, sharing successes, learning from failures and also  letting levity and laughter in will always be the keys to what is called Knowledge Management.  Yes everything is happening much faster now but that doesn't always mean much better in terms of what we're learning.</p>

<p>Having the ability to spew out more explicit knowledge can prove to be a double-edged sword particularly if we persist in trying to digest it all. Today we are struggling to contain BMI (Body Mass Index)......Will tomorrow be about trying to reduce KMI (Knowledge Management Index) in order to tackle the next great threat of what some are calling infoluenza? </p> ]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-03-09T20:26:33Z</published>
    <updated>2007-03-09T20:26:33Z</updated>

  </entry> 

  <entry>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:blog.jackvinson.com,2007://1.8163" type="text/html" href="http://blog.jackvinson.com/archives/2007/03/08/no_such_thing_as_a_km_system.html"/>


    <id>tag:blog.jackvinson.com,2007://1.8163.17857</id> 
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.jackvinson.com/archives/2007/03/08/no_such_thing_as_a_km_system.html#comment-17857" /> 
    <title>Comment from Randy Smith on 2007-03-11</title>
    <author>
        <name>Randy Smith</name> 
        <uri></uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">     
      <![CDATA[ <p>I was just reading "Organizational Knowledge and Technology" by Rodrigo Magulhaes.  In his definition of an information system, the organization and people use technology to gather, store, process, use and deciminate knowledge.</p>

<p>It is my understanding that KM best practices has taught us that the human element is key to success, and that technology is a tool. The list of KM tools contains communication modes and models, not just software.</p> ]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-03-11T22:20:27Z</published>
    <updated>2007-03-11T22:20:27Z</updated>

  </entry> 

</feed>
