<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
         xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0" 
         xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.jackvinson.com/archives/2007/03/27/making_sense_of_dikw.html" /> 
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blog.jackvinson.com/archives/2007/03/27/making_sense_of_dikw.xml" />
  <id>tag:blog.jackvinson.com,2007://1/tag:blog.jackvinson.com,2007://1.8187-</id> 
  <updated>2007-12-03T11:39:47Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for Making sense of D-I-K-W</title> 
  <subtitle>Jack Vinson writes about knowledge management, personal effectiveness, theory of constraints and more.  As of December 2007 Jack will likely start writing about product management too.</subtitle>
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.01</generator>

  <entry>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:blog.jackvinson.com,2007://1.8187" type="text/html" href="http://blog.jackvinson.com/archives/2007/03/27/making_sense_of_dikw.html"/>


    <id>tag:blog.jackvinson.com,2007://1.8187.17875</id> 
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.jackvinson.com/archives/2007/03/27/making_sense_of_dikw.html#comment-17875" /> 
    <title>Comment from James Dellow on 2007-03-28</title>
    <author>
        <name>James Dellow</name> 
        <uri>http://chieftech.blogspot.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://chieftech.blogspot.com">     
      <![CDATA[ <p>Hmm. I've thought about it (not for long) but no matter what we do to it, I still don't like the D>I>K model... sorry I can't be more constructive!</p> ]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-03-28T10:18:14Z</published>
    <updated>2007-03-28T10:18:14Z</updated>

  </entry> 

  <entry>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:blog.jackvinson.com,2007://1.8187" type="text/html" href="http://blog.jackvinson.com/archives/2007/03/27/making_sense_of_dikw.html"/>


    <id>tag:blog.jackvinson.com,2007://1.8187.17881</id> 
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.jackvinson.com/archives/2007/03/27/making_sense_of_dikw.html#comment-17881" /> 
    <title>Comment from Patrick Lambe on 2007-04-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>Patrick Lambe</name> 
        <uri>http://www.greenchameleon.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.greenchameleon.com">     
      <![CDATA[ <p>Definitely an improvement, except that action can feed back into both knowledge and information - eg if I observe you doing something, or you take an action and get immediate feedback.</p>

<p>But above the technical accuracy, I'm curious about how such diagrams help us figure things out or make decisions. Don't they need to be contextualised and concretised to make sense?</p> ]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-04-04T15:05:19Z</published>
    <updated>2007-04-04T15:05:19Z</updated>

  </entry> 

  <entry>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:blog.jackvinson.com,2007://1.8187" type="text/html" href="http://blog.jackvinson.com/archives/2007/03/27/making_sense_of_dikw.html"/>


    <id>tag:blog.jackvinson.com,2007://1.8187.17882</id> 
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.jackvinson.com/archives/2007/03/27/making_sense_of_dikw.html#comment-17882" /> 
    <title>Comment from jackvinson on 2007-04-04</title>
    <author>
        <name>jackvinson</name> 
        <uri>http://blog.jackvinson.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blog.jackvinson.com">     
      <![CDATA[ <p>Patrick, I was thinking the same thing when I put the drawing together (regarding "what do you do with it").  It seems the model is far too generic to be of value in and of itself.  Another reason to step back from the whole idea of D-I-K-W.</p> ]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-04-05T03:06:30Z</published>
    <updated>2007-04-05T03:06:30Z</updated>

  </entry> 

</feed>
