<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" 
         xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0" 
         xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.jackvinson.com/archives/2007/11/30/why_bother_with_online_social_networks.html" /> 
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blog.jackvinson.com/archives/2007/11/30/why_bother_with_online_social_networks.xml" />
  <id>tag:blog.jackvinson.com,2007://1/tag:blog.jackvinson.com,2007://1.8484-</id> 
  <updated>2007-12-03T11:16:14Z</updated>
  <title>Comments for Why bother with online social networks</title> 
  <subtitle>Jack Vinson writes about knowledge management, personal effectiveness, theory of constraints and more.  As of December 2007 Jack will likely start writing about product management too.</subtitle>
  <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.01</generator>

  <entry>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:blog.jackvinson.com,2007://1.8484" type="text/html" href="http://blog.jackvinson.com/archives/2007/11/30/why_bother_with_online_social_networks.html"/>


    <id>tag:blog.jackvinson.com,2007://1.8484.19122</id> 
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.jackvinson.com/archives/2007/11/30/why_bother_with_online_social_networks.html#comment-19122" /> 
    <title>Comment from Doug Cornelius on 2007-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>Doug Cornelius</name> 
        <uri>http://kmspace.blogspot.com</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://kmspace.blogspot.com">     
      <![CDATA[ <p>Jack -</p>

<p>If you accept Davenport's position that networking is about reciprocity and giving, I think I agree with him about LinkedIn.  </p>

<p>I find LinkedIn to be little more than an online contact list. And one that is often out of date (Have you updated your LinkedIn profile yet?) There is little flow of information.  I have used the answer function a bit, but it is not that useful.  LinkedIn is useful, but it is boring.</p>

<p>I do disagree with Davenport's position on Facebook. Personally, I am not always sure where the line between business and personal should be drawn or whether a line even exists. </p> ]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-11-30T21:06:17Z</published>
    <updated>2007-11-30T21:06:17Z</updated>

  </entry> 

  <entry>
    <thr:in-reply-to ref="tag:blog.jackvinson.com,2007://1.8484" type="text/html" href="http://blog.jackvinson.com/archives/2007/11/30/why_bother_with_online_social_networks.html"/>


    <id>tag:blog.jackvinson.com,2007://1.8484.19123</id> 
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blog.jackvinson.com/archives/2007/11/30/why_bother_with_online_social_networks.html#comment-19123" /> 
    <title>Comment from Albert | UrbanMonk.Net on 2007-11-30</title>
    <author>
        <name>Albert | UrbanMonk.Net</name> 
        <uri>http://www.urbanmonk.net</uri>
    </author>
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.urbanmonk.net">     
      <![CDATA[ <p>To be honest I've never gotten much value from Linked In or Facebook or any of the other similar sites. I know a lot of people who swear by it though, maybe they have a special way of using it, or they just put so much time into it.</p>

<p>Cheers,<br />
Albert | UrbanMonk.net<br />
</p> ]]>
    </content>
    <published>2007-12-01T02:49:23Z</published>
    <updated>2007-12-01T02:49:23Z</updated>

  </entry> 

</feed>
