No one will share with an idiot
Victor Newman has started blogging with Knowledgeworks. I've always appreciated his unconventional take on knowledge management, so I was happy to see that he hasn't changed his approach in this piece, Don't Share -Build. From the summary (and to see he take on the world):
- Reduce the number of idiots in the organisation to the bare minimum necessary. No-one will share anything with an idiot.
- Employ the tactic of using language with real meaning. Deliberately stop talking about Knowledge Sharing: it only confuses people with its altruism and its implicit democratic message. Start defining aspirational knowledge frameworks within which new knowledge can be built that meets the need of delivering competitive advantage.
- Create crises to focus knowledge contribution from those who can, and remove investment from the aimless sharing of everything.
- Use 30/70 until they notice, then do something else.
One of Victor's early comments is that knowledge follows the laws of supply and demand: knowledge available to many people has less value than knowledge available to the few. The more common claim is that knowledge isn't like commodities in that is not limited supply: you can share an idea with one person or 100 people. These statements aren't opposed to one another, they just expose different philosophies about knowledge sharing. Victor seems to be onto something, though.
Oh, and be prepared. These aren't short little blog posts.
We were both employees of Pfizer, though I never had the opportunity to work directly with him before deciding to do other stuff.
2 Comment(s)
idiot is some1 that lacks my set of morals. yes ?


One Point 1: The problem is that "idiot" is relative. You're always an idiot if you are in a job that you too small to fill. So it's not the individual but the relationship of the person to the job.
And almost everyone in a disciplinary domain, from medicine to knowledge management, thinks that those who lack their secret knowledge are idiots. Which explains some of the value of knowledge that is useful to only a few being really knowledge only known to a few, which is more about the lure of the Inner Circle than the value of the knowledge given.
Compounding the problem is that most companies are so poorly run that they have a variety of differently levels of capability all smashed into the same organizational level.
It also smacks of "everyone should be as smart as I am". Which is just silliness.