Goldratt on forecasting
Anyone who has spent time studying Theory of Constraints knows that the idea of forecasting and extrapolation is an anathema to being smart about making decisions.
Here are a pair of related items on Goldratt's views of the current economic issues, particularly in relation to a manufacturer who was worried about their future in light of all the dire economic news.
- The Power of Cause and Effect (pdf) article from January 2009.
- And here is a video of Goldratt discussing the findings described in the article
Suffice to say, a little research showed that the standard news media weren't a good source of accurate information. Goldratt goes through the process of digging up useful information from which this company could make sensible decisions.
3 Comment(s)
I have read The Critical Chain during my studies in project management (international project coordinator). I am intrigued how ToC could be found at every company as one of the most important keys to success.
Right now I am working on a piece for Open Forum site (American Express) on different indexes as forecasting tool. As a follow-up post, I will look into the Purchasing Managers' Index in more detail.
All the Best,
Martin Lindeskog - American in spirit.
Gothenburg, Sweden.
Dave A., I am confused by your comment! "Who cares" is my general response to it. Exchange rates, saving rates and the credit market....what does this have to do with anything??? Eli was not ignorant to these things, he just simply ignored them because they are almost meaningless. Examining these notions haphazardly or listening to the economic tzars and then treating their words as the gospel is cold-comfort. Are you waiting for aggregate banking statistics to be optimistic before you feel happy again??? Goldratts' point is that this recession is fake! A bullshit financial crisis is in the process of fueling an even more bullshit, self-fulfilling economic crisis. There is always a win-win and it takes WORK to discover it and then use it, even in a self-created recession. Just look at the magnitude of Eli's distribution solution then put this on the economic backdrop of today....can't you then see why he doesn't care about this crap??? The dist. solution doesn't even compare to gloomy economic news! Can you do something in your life or have you succumbed to a deterministic world where you have no influence? Stop reading the garbage in the newspapers and think for yourself, acquaint yourself with Eli's work and try to tell me you still feel helpless. I think this is what Eli meant when he said its "A Matter of Choice"!
Leave a comment
Previous entry: Twitter Mosaic
Next entry: Messing the managers




While it is always hard to argue with Eli's logic and I generally agree that a small drop in GDP should not grossly affect sales volume there are other factors at play which Eli appears to ignore in this paper...
(1) Propensity to Save
The last decade has been remarkable in certain countries by the lack of personal/domestic saving. Folks tended to rely on wealth creation from property and stocks (in pension plans) for their retirement. Both have been heavily damaged by the recent bubble bursting. Domestic savings need to increase dramatically. This will affect retail demand particularly for high ticket items that don't need to be replaced e.g. cars.
(2) Currency changes
The US Dollar and the British Pound particularly have decreased dramatically in value making imports much more expensive. This affects the price of imported goods and will again affect retail demand in these economies.
Meanwhile, the Japanese Yen has appreciated in value dramatically but the Japanese do not spend a lot of money in retail stores on imported goods. One winner might be the Scotch Whisky industry whose sales in Japan may do better.
The trends in currency valuation are not short term. The whole market will need to adjust to a strong Yen, a strong Euro and a weak Dollar and Pound.
(3) Market Liquidity / Banking Propensity for Risk / Credit Availability
The end of 2008 saw a dramatic re-assessment of the capital banks need to keep on-hand against funds lent. Most of the 2008 bailout funds went to re-capitalizing banks and relveling their risk exposure rather than on lending to the market. As a result 2009 and beyond is a world of significantly less liquidity and significantly less credit availability.
This represents a dramatic contraction in available funds for companies to float inventories and supply chain credit and for consumers to spend in retail stores.
All 3 of these factors seem to indicate that the downturn in retail sales will be significantly worse than the drop in GDP and prolonged much longer than required time for a shock to propagate through the supply chain.
In my opinion, the winners in 2009/2010 will be firms that adjust their processes to run on very low inventory with very fast turns (short lead times), coupled to increased customer intimacy. Firms that have a better grasp of what consumers will buy and at what price point while having the infrastructure/supply chain to react to these market demands will be the winner.
I believe that Eli has the tools in his toolkit to really help firms manage the crisis but that the material in this article isn't it. A conspiracy theorist might suggest it was deliberate misdirection. Knowing Eli a little I don't believe he thinks like that, so I find this article surprising. I have observed him think things through more deeply than the depth I see here.
David